"The profession has a problem it has not named."
AI is already in use across Indian legal practice — in research, in drafting, in the submissions placed before courts. No national professional standard governs how it is used. This work builds that standard. Not as theory. As a practitioner's method, grounded in professional obligation, tested in active litigation.
Santoshi Kumari was eleven years old. She died on 28 September 2017. Her family had not completed an Aadhaar linkage requirement. Their ration card was cancelled. For six to eight months before her death, the family received no rations from the public distribution system.
The system did not malfunction. It operated according to the rules embedded within it. Those rules produced the exclusion. No officer issued the order. No document recorded the decision. The platform simply said no.
This is the first reality an advocate must see: the algorithmic state governs citizens' lives at population scale, producing determinations that affect legal rights without written orders, named decision-makers, or recorded reasons. The advocate who cannot see this layer cannot fully represent the client who lives under it.
Across identity verification, welfare delivery, tax enforcement, law enforcement, financial compliance, and economic regulation, India now deploys automated systems that produce determinations affecting legal rights at a scale no human administrative process could sustain.
Aadhaar processed 2,707 crore authentications in FY 2024–25. The GST Network's analytics infrastructure detected evasion of ₹7.08 lakh crore across 91,370 cases in five years. The Direct Benefit Transfer system governs entitlements for 176 crore beneficiaries. Every client who walks into a chamber is already subject to one or more of these systems.
The constitutional grounds for challenging such systems are well established. What was missing was the advocate equipped to mount those challenges — and the method to do it.
The second reality operates inside the profession itself. AI tools are in use in research, drafting, and submissions. Over half of Indian legal professionals report using AI in their practice. And the courts are finding the consequences.
These are not warnings about a future risk. They are judicial findings about present conduct, occurring now, in courts at every level of the system.
The profession adopted AI without first building a method of use consistent with professional responsibility. No national professional standard governs how AI is used by India's 1.7 million advocates. The governance gap is total. This work fills it.
The complete professional position on AI in Indian legal practice — from first principles to adversarial competence to institutional governance. No one sells you your judgment. No one sells you your capability. No one sells you your standard. You build all three.
The three publications form a complete system. Volume I establishes the practitioner's standard. The Field Guide makes it usable in every matter. Volume II deploys it adversarially and hands the profession's institutions the governance instruments they have not yet built. Together, they constitute the complete professional position on artificial intelligence in Indian legal practice.
Register now to secure your copy of AI for Indian Advocates: The Practitioner's Standard for Supervised Intelligence at first-edition pricing. Delivery to your registered address on release date.
The Field Guide is in production — use the form to register for Field Guide notification separately. Both publications ship from Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.
Self-published by the author. ISBN applied in the author's name. Printed and distributed by Vinod Law Publications, Prayagraj. Pricing will be communicated on confirmation of order.
Five stages governing every AI-assisted legal task. Three are exclusively human. Two are AI-assisted under continuous advocate direction. No stage may be inverted, skipped, or delegated. This is the operational standard introduced in AI for Indian Advocates — derived from professional obligations that predate and will survive any specific AI platform.
Four questions an advocate must be able to answer before submitting any AI-assisted work — and before challenging the opponent's. The ART operates in both directions: inward on your own work product, outward as a forensic weapon against the opposing submissions.
Structured knowledge transfer on supervised AI use — for Bar Associations, law schools, and institutional legal teams. Grounded in the SIM and ART frameworks. Calibrated to Indian practice conditions. This is not legal services. It is capacity building.
Indicative academic and institutional honorarium ranges for training engagements. All fees subject to discussion based on institution type, programme scope, and audience size.
| Programme | Format | Honorarium Range |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate 1:1 Coaching | 2–3 Sessions | ₹10,000–₹25,000 |
| Bar Association CLE | Half-Day | ₹25,000–₹50,000 |
| Law Firm Workshop | Full-Day | ₹50,000+ |
| Law School Seminar | 2–4 Hours | ₹8,000–₹15,000 |
Interested in a programme? Submit your institution details and requirements using the contact form — a response follows within 2 working days.
Submit EnquiryShivam Shukla is the author of AI for Indian Advocates and the creator of the Supervised Intelligence Method — the first original operational framework for AI use in Indian litigation. His work defines the conditions under which AI-assisted legal work remains professionally valid. That is a different category of contribution from technology commentary or legal ethics guidance.
He holds B.Com, M.Com, and LL.B. (Hons.) degrees from the University of Allahabad. His research was presented at the International Conference on New Age Legal Dynamics, UPES School of Law, Dehradun (February 2026), where he co-presented the paper Potential Imprints of AI on the Litigation Landscape of India.
"Every framework presented in this work has been applied in real matters before being formalised. The SIM and ART methodologies were developed in active litigation — not constructed from theory alone."
— Preface, AI for Indian AdvocatesHis practice at the Allahabad High Court, active since July 2019 across constitutional and administrative law, revenue and property law, criminal law, and family law, gives his frameworks the practical grounding that purely academic treatments cannot supply. The cross-examination architecture in Chapter 14 of Volume I is his professional methodology, applied before he formalised it in print.
This website contains educational and informational content. It does not constitute legal advice or solicitation of professional engagement.
For training enquiries, book-related correspondence, consulting mandates, or speaking invitations — submit your requirements directly. Response within 2 working days.
Training and consulting engagements involve preparation time and professional commitment. Detailed requirements help provide accurate responses. This platform does not solicit legal work. Professional engagement is subject to applicable professional conduct rules.